POE-ISS-002
open/op:supervisor-review promises session or claim-set review, while review-delegate currently accepts one claim and needs a verify command.
Issue backlog catalog · snapshot 2026-09-16 23:19 UTC · PBC dogfood backlog + ledger mentions
/op:supervisor-review promises session or claim-set review, while review-delegate currently accepts one claim and needs a verify command.
/op:delegate has no general CLI route to an implementer that is not already assigned or reviewing the task.
Session-derived harness ids, carrier ids, and authority identities are separate axes and current adapters do not map all of them cleanly.
review-delegate may launch reviewing Pi with --approve, which can trust the project-local extension being reviewed.
Dogfood acceptance must be falsifiable, not just a prose judgment that the ledger is clearer.
Distinct-UID verification currently blocks on ad hoc sudo/auth state; the correct UX is a human-visible authorization prompt, not a hidden agent retry or same-UID downgrade.
Verifier-only identities cannot attach draft/no-status evidence because evidence attachment without verification requires builder authority; verifier rerun logs must be attached as verified evidence or supplied through a builder-produced artifact path.
/op:handoff treated a one-word user input "go" as a literal next_action and recorded an empty handoff with null fields instead of generating a useful closeout from current task context.
/op:claim and /op:evidence work but ask too many questions for the common path; Step 5 needs opinionated defaults so normal dogfood does not require the owner to re-specify obvious task, author, type, claim, and verify command fields.
/op:doctor and /op:status are slow on large ledgers and previously showed no visible progress while running.
Generated review_delegations scripts are not yet reliable end-to-end: operator-verifier may lack Pi provider credentials/home setup, sudo resets PATH so pytest may be unavailable, pytest cache writes warn under the verifier UID, and the generated prompt still suggests --verified-
Review/delegation UI exposed too much harness plumbing: users reason in terms of model/persona targets such as Claude/Luna/Grok, while Pi is a carrier runtime and operator-verifier is a separate Unix authority identity.
review-delegate resolved the Grok persona to the wrong provider/model: the intended xai/grok-4.x target was generated as openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna (the Luna seat's cloud model), so pi hunted for a missing openai-codex credential instead of the present xai grant. Same GroK-vs-Luna